A reply that does not distract from the original post II

TheSaints



Joined: 28/01/2009
Posts: 1369

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 16:15

The last thread was deleted with my reply to msg#8 deleted despite it not being against the rules in any way.



AJ I am not involved in your sqaubles I am however involved in supporting Lees, Dave Zerochlor's, Pauls efforts and anyone elses efforts in helping little Ismail.



Effective communication is a wonderfull tool in resolving problems when applied correctly I suggest you contact "my mate Paul" and settle your personal issues yourself it seems to be the adult thing to do, you do not require me as a mediator.

AnthonySmith


Joined: 14/05/2009
Posts: 455

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 16:26

TheSaints, I can't honestly understand all the sniping. If someone wants to support or promote another forum that is their own business and know one should be able to tell anyone anything else.

But just because another forum is backing this auction doesn't mean, in my humble opinion, that Cyprus 44 has to have all manner of posts for the other forum.

I've been a member of a number of other forums in my time and none of them would have accepted this, especially from members - not the people making decisions.

I understand you are trying to promote the auction in aid of Ismail, and for that, you are a good man.

But I don't agree in the constant attempts to bend Cyprus 44 to the will of a minority. Sorry

TheSaints



Joined: 28/01/2009
Posts: 1369

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 16:29

I am at a loss at what you are getting at please read my message above and explain where I am trying to do that?



I am not sniping at anyone I am replying to a comment that was made directly to me from a mod who then closed the thread after his comment.



I have only used my right to reply and in what is a positive, informative and constructive manner.

AnthonySmith


Joined: 14/05/2009
Posts: 455

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 16:35

I apologise, The Saints, I was looking at the overall picture, not simply your reply.



My sentiments are about the whole picture. Your post is part of it.



And, having read, Alsancak Jack's reply in the other thread, I don't see he has done anything wrong. He is supplied with information by friends, not snooping. In much the same way I am supplied with information about what's happening back in the UK, or here in North Cyprus.

TheSaints



Joined: 28/01/2009
Posts: 1369

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 16:42

I did not imply he had done anything wrong in my response I replied to his post as I said in a positive manner please do not try to twist the meaning of what is quite plain to understand.



Again read msg#1

AnthonySmith


Joined: 14/05/2009
Posts: 455

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 16:46

I'm well aware of what you wrote in message 1, and think you have a positive outcome in mind, but remember it is on the back of a lot of sniping, including from you in other threads, about the admins



I shall bow out now. Good luck

TheSaints



Joined: 28/01/2009
Posts: 1369

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 16:54

I should think so too as it looks like you want to start to make this personal, would you like my tel number and we can keep it personal and not on the forum?



I have made approx 3 or 4 comments about admin recently and that is it, considerably less than a lot of people and not a lot in 2 years I also have the right to complain when I think something is being over moderated.

AnthonySmith


Joined: 14/05/2009
Posts: 455

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 17:17

I wasn't going to reply, because I thought I would bow out for Ismail.

However...

I am not making this personal and hope that wasn't a veiled threat. I can't email you, which I would have done earlier, because you have opted to hide your email address. Mine is in my profile.

TheSaints



Joined: 28/01/2009
Posts: 1369

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 17:28

Where do you see a Veiled threat? funny that someone else has just used that very phrase in an email to me and we both know who that is.



You seem to be intent on spoiling for an argument well not being one to disapoint or backaway.



Don't email me call me it's easy +33615796747

AnthonySmith


Joined: 14/05/2009
Posts: 455

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 17:36

I am not spoiling for an argument. You seem to be upping the ante to suggest I am. I don't know who has emailed you. Why should I? This is getting stupid.

Am I not allowed a viewpoint, simply because it doesn't tally with yours?

And you're "not being one to disappoint or backaway" line tallies with the feel of the post I questioned. Maybe you don't realise how your replies are coming across? Maybe I'm reading them wrong. Maybe it is my fault. But I'm telling it how it seems to be to me.

TheSaints



Joined: 28/01/2009
Posts: 1369

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 17:41

You are reading them wrong.

AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
09/01/2011 17:55

This thread is now closed. Reason: Thread was addressed and no need for further posts.