UK Lawyers- Any suggestions about "Natural Justice"?North Cyprus Forums Homepage Join Cyprus44 Board | Already a member? Login
Popular Posts - List of popular topics discussed on our board.
You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.
elko2
Joined: 24/07/2007 Posts: 4400
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 17:54 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 1 of 19 in Discussion |
| I have an authoritative booklet on "Natural Justice in Canada" but I am looking for some precedents or authoritative work about this subject and especially about the right of the accused to have access to all evidence against him before the trial unless of course it is against public policy. Any links will be most welcome. ismet |
dalartokat
Joined: 14/04/2008 Posts: 734
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 19:12 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 2 of 19 in Discussion |
| uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/1840/10chapter10.pdf Ismet, is this what you are looking for. Sylvie |
wynyardman
Joined: 15/12/2007 Posts: 4580
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 19:16 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 3 of 19 in Discussion |
| Elko2, If you are looking for natrual justice, then you are most certainly living in the wrong place. The home of Natrual Justice, is the UK, but you need to hurry! Times they are a changin! wyn |
Hack_the_mac
Joined: 30/11/2011 Posts: 27
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 19:22 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 4 of 19 in Discussion |
| nick freeman is your man . |
elko2
Joined: 24/07/2007 Posts: 4400
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 21:17 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 5 of 19 in Discussion |
| Thanks Sylvie, I have already downloaded the document. There are parts in it that I can use. Do you know the name of the book, date of publication etc. ? I am actually looking for an expansion of the third rule of Natural Justice. As far as I know, the first rule is for the accused to know what he is accused with, the second ruıle about the right to be heard and the third rule about having access to all evidence provided they are not against Public Interest. i.e. I am looking for authority that states all evidence must be given to the accused before the trial. As far as UK is concerned, in traffic cases the law states that all evidence must be served on the accused at least seven days before the trial. If it was not for the specific law, is this essential beased on Natural Justice? ismet |
Giles
Joined: 16/08/2011 Posts: 256
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 21:32 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 6 of 19 in Discussion |
| Traffic cases are covered by a Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP). I would look up the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) for rules of advanced disclosure. |
Hector
Joined: 26/08/2008 Posts: 2352
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 22:24 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 8 of 19 in Discussion |
| See Article 6 (Right to a fair trial) European Convention on Human Rights, 'The prosecutions duty of disclosure.' Art 6(3)(d) See Edwards v UK 1993 15 E.H.R.R 417 Jaspers v Belgium App.No.8403/78.27 D.R.6 |
Bradus
Joined: 25/02/2007 Posts: 2641
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 22:27 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 9 of 19 in Discussion |
| Hector, I'm impressed! |
elko2
Joined: 24/07/2007 Posts: 4400
Message Posted: 02/12/2011 22:35 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 10 of 19 in Discussion |
| Thanks Hector but Art. 6(3)(d) the exact wording is: "to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;" I cannot find anything in the European Convention on Human Rights, about 'The prosecutions duty of disclosure". The nearest thing to it is the reference to a fair trial in art. 6(1). ismet |
Brinsley
Joined: 04/04/2009 Posts: 6858
Message Posted: 03/12/2011 01:17 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 11 of 19 in Discussion |
| 'St Natural Juice' is a concentrate mixed with warped laws and dodgy watered down black-gowned idiots! Richard |
HairyPeggy01
Joined: 01/09/2010 Posts: 24
Message Posted: 03/12/2011 06:43 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 12 of 19 in Discussion |
| When my son had a small brush with the law many years ago, our solicitor gave the magistrates an ear bashing over thé fact that, at the time, the police were not obliged to furnish all evidence in juvenile cases. Maybe it has changed now. |
elko2
Joined: 24/07/2007 Posts: 4400
Message Posted: 03/12/2011 07:54 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 13 of 19 in Discussion |
| I think the ECHR judgement that Hector is refferring to above (msg. 8) is about full disclosure i.e. the prosecution is obliged to disclose all evidence for and against the accused and not hide the ones in the accused favour. What I am looking for is the obligation for the prosecution to submit all evidence to the accused before the trial and in essence well in advance to give him the time to research if necessary. "Natural Justice in Canada" http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26171843/10_Principles_of_Natural_Justice.pdf page 101 states: "The normal rule that a person is entitled to know all of the evidence against him before being heard may be modified for reason of public policy". Is there anything similar from UK? ismet |
pollymarples
Joined: 08/08/2010 Posts: 1778
Message Posted: 10/12/2011 08:50 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 19 of 19 in Discussion |
| Natural Justice must have got lost in the post Ismet, bit like some of mine which arrived eventually afte going via Thailand. I googled Natural Justice, lots of info. |
North Cyprus Forums Homepage
Join Cyprus44 Forums | Already a member? Login
You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.
|