Go Ahead for 3rd Runway Heathrow!

Nunu1


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 536

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 15:49

For anybody that may be interested, the rotten corrupt Labour Government have given the go ahead for a new 3rd Runway at Heathrow. This is close to where I am currently living and grew up around the areas/villages that will be bulldozed.



Two of the Historic buildings that will be bulldozed is a Norman church that has featured in films and one of the only standing Saxon buildings in the World the Tithe barn.



What a disgrace this Lot are to allow this to happen!



nunu1

lovingcyprus


Joined: 02/03/2007
Posts: 1272

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 16:02

Rest assured this will never ever go ahead



I guess your opinion of the Labour crooks is much the same as mine

Nunu1


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 536

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 16:05

Loving Cyprus, this has been a done deal under the table years ago!



Ive seen plans and legal papers that I had to keep shcdum about!



The Brown envelopes went under the table years ago and no doubt recently to the Ministers that Gave the approval!



nunu1

Hector


Joined: 26/08/2008
Posts: 2352

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 16:09

I prefer Boris Johnsons idea of a new airport in the Thames estuary.

Nunu1


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 536

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 16:15

Yes Im just watching Boris live now...the Man speaks sense! This is a much better option!



Heathrow is the only building site in the World with its own airport!



Its time to build a brand new airport from scatch...



nunu1

brian24001


Joined: 23/03/2008
Posts: 606

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 16:24

As the lable of 'London' Airport seems the encompass and ever widening circle, i.e. 'London' Stansted - it's miles away!! Why don't they just change the name of Hull airport to London Hull Airport.

Job done, extra capacity though 'London', no expense of another construction catastrophe, jobs created in a deprived area (actually 'deprived area' probably cover pretty much all the UK), it can serve as a 'northern terminsl', and everyone who has received the alleged handouts can pay it back to help fill the pensions black hole.

Every ones a winner (except those that pay back alleged handouts).

Quarmby


Joined: 15/09/2008
Posts: 975

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 17:00

Nunu1

'It's time to build an airport from scratch' as long as its not in your backyard eh!

Nunu1


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 536

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 17:09

Quarmby YES is my answer to you!.....



You have no idea what we have to put up with living close to Heathrow!



We accept the need for progress and continued business.....but an additional runway and demolishing peoples homes, businesses, schools and Historic buildings is insane and unnacceptable.



It makes perfect sense to build a completley new airport from scratch on land that will not affect anybody, homes etc. The Thames estuary site that has been ear marked for years is the perfect site and safer as aircraft depart and land approaching over water rather than populated homes etc.



AND dont forget, the issue of pollution and peoples health is very important. Breathing in burnt kerosine every day is very harmful to health!



nunu1

JimmyG


Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 900

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 17:16

London already has 5 airports, which is more than the nearest European capital - Paris. Ironically there are more flights to both Paris & Manchester daily from Heathrow than to any other destinations. The Government and certain business leaders keep talking about economic reasons to justify the expansion and miss the point that it is for environmental reasons that this should be stopped. Not even a proper debate in Parliament to discuss - disgraceful!!

lovingcyprus


Joined: 02/03/2007
Posts: 1272

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 17:51

Not even a proper debate in Parliament to discuss - disgraceful!!



That sums up the corrupt Labour Government

dickyboy


Joined: 31/12/2008
Posts: 129

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:02

Only good news i can see in this is the Holiday Inn @ Sipson will go what a s**t hotel !!

Quarmby


Joined: 15/09/2008
Posts: 975

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:31

Nunu1

I presume you did not live in the vicinty before the Airport was built? If not surely you were aware of the consequences of living next to an airport, just a point.

The-Wicks


Joined: 27/05/2007
Posts: 2279

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:35

Quarmby - Nunu's age on his profile is given as 45, so I think the airport was there before he was. Having said that, possibly nowhere near as extensive as it is now.



J

Nunu1


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 536

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:39

Quarmby I have lived near Heathrow for 37 years. YES aware of some consequences but enough is enough...You have to be realistic and unless you are from this area I dont think with respect you understand the implications.



Our local MP John Mcdonell that has battled hard to oppose this insane expansion has been barred from the Houses of Hot air for airing his outrage and views on this decision. (And He is Labour!)



The Concervatives and Boris Johnson have strongly opposed this decision and development.



nunu1

karakum5c



Joined: 18/03/2008
Posts: 1021

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:42

Everytime they increase the capacity in the south east of the country the number of direct regional departures to foreign destinations decreases as airlines centralise their flights into large hubs.

Genghis


Joined: 15/01/2009
Posts: 43

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:50

Cannot understand how anyone who chooses to live close to an airport can complain about problems such as pollution and burnt kerosine. These must have been issues when you moved in?

Nunu1


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 536

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:56

Gengis with respect mate read the postings clearly!!!!!!!



AND for your information this will affect Millions of other people under the current and new flight paths, hence a larger impact all round.



Enjoy where ever you live!!



nunu1

JimmyG


Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 900

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:59

Genghis the problem here is that those problems will increase and it's the environment that will suffer - this is far bigger than a local issue and London already is well served for airports.

lovingcyprus


Joined: 02/03/2007
Posts: 1272

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 18:59

Genghis did you not read message 13 before you posted your stupid message

karakum5c



Joined: 18/03/2008
Posts: 1021

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 19:01

Genghis as a nomadic tribesman you should have no need of planes as you live under the stars in your tent with your many wives and concubines.



Ah how i envy you Great Khan !

Genghis


Joined: 15/01/2009
Posts: 43

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 19:08

Sorry guys but its all NIMBY to me, it should and will goahead to the benefit of the UK

Nunu1


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 536

Message Posted:
15/01/2009 19:46

Genghis Youve obviously got your head up your *arse! What a muppet you are!



Why dont you tell the people all round Heathrow and London your statement of in favour of go ahead!



nunu1

JimmyG


Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 900

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 12:12

Genghis re Msg 21 - when you say benefit are you talking financially or environmentally ?

Genghis


Joined: 15/01/2009
Posts: 43

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 12:18

Financially,the enviromental card is played far too much these days and is nothing more than an excuse for governments all over the world to raise taxes. Rest assured this scheme will go ahead with benefits to the UK,and as an added bonus all the locals who have complained for years about the pollution will have their houses compulsory purchased over market value allowing them to live in a more pleasant enviroment. Everyones a winner?

JimmyG


Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 900

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 13:06

Genghis, how can the environmental card be overplayed when surely that must be the overriding concern rather than financial gain? You've mentioned nimby's but surely you display a similar trait by saying in effect I'm all for it and I don't care about the lasting environmental effects or impact on the future generations? Clearly we have divergent views on this but for what it's worth I still don't think it's going to happen.

Genghis


Joined: 15/01/2009
Posts: 43

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 13:26

i don't agree with the whole enviroment argument,i like many others do not believe the planet is suffering global warming due to co2, if you look at the history of the planet you will clearly see it has always showed patterns of warm/cold over the centuries. One day the world governments will be exposed for using this as an opportunity to gather more and more tax.

JimmyG


Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 900

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 13:47

Genghis, so in the meantime you're advocating that we sit on our hands do nothing and just leave the global warming issue to future generations - not our problem - and again you confirm that your only concern and consideration is financial.

We will never agree on this - but I can live with that.

Genghis


Joined: 15/01/2009
Posts: 43

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 15:40

Thanks for respecting my point of view it makes a nice change from being insulted. I dont donsider it a matter of doing nothing as i dont believe there to be a problem there in the first place,so doing nothing isnt really the question is it?

JimmyG


Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 900

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 16:08

Genghis this is not an insult, and I know your views about dogs - but you don't by any chance keep ostriches do you?!!!

Genghis


Joined: 15/01/2009
Posts: 43

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 16:16

no but ive eaten a few ;)

JimmyG


Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 900

Message Posted:
16/01/2009 16:34

Genghis, good answer but I think we'd best leave it to others now to get back on topic!!